F1 season finale: McLaren to appeal FIA decision
By LJ Hutchins
Monday, October 22nd, 2007
It’s not over until the fat lady sings…
McLaren are appealing against a decision by the FIA to take no action over three cars that were found to be running with fuel temperature irregularities.
The cars of Robert Kubica, Nick Heidfeld and Nico Rosberg, driving for the BMW Sauber and Williams teams, were found to have fuel temperatures below the permitted minimum, a circumstance that could lead to a power advantage.
As anyone paying close attention will know, these are the three cars that finished ahead of Lewis Hamilton, depriving him of the points he needed to beat Kimi Raikkonen to the drivers’ championship.
But, after representations from the teams and a three-hour discussion, the stewards decided to take no action.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, McLaren have asked them to reconsider.
Our view: a less than perfect end to a less than perfect season. After Ferrari won the constructors’ championship in a courtroom there’d be a delicious irony in them losing the drivers’ championship the same way.
Unfortunately, two wrongs don’t make a right.
Related posts:
- F1 season finale: ‘As you were, chaps,’ say stewards
- F1 season finale: Could ‘dodgy fuel’ hand title to Hamilton? And should it?
- F1: Hamilton distances himself from “cruel” appeal
- F1 season finale: McLaren called upon to explain itself
- F1: McLaren breaks Ferrari’s dominance at Spa
Read more about BMW Sauber, F1 drivers’ championship, Ferrari, Formula One, Kimi Raikkonen, Lewis Hamilton, McLaren, Nick Heidfeld, Nico Rosberg, Robert Kubica, Williams F1.
This entry was posted on Monday, October 22nd, 2007 at 10:51 am and is filed under F1. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Don't forget you can keep up with Brits on Pole in the following ways: via RSS feed, or by receiving our weekly newsletter (and get a free F1 ebook when you do). Or follow us on Twitter or Racing Blips.







